Scope of this research
-
A critique of the regulatory and policy framework proposed by the European Commission to drive the deployment of CCS across new fossil-fuel plants.
- Analysis of the wider EU 'green' policy landscape, how it lacks credibility and provides inadequate regulatory support for CCS.
- Reasons why the green 'New Deal' is a necessary but insufficient condition to drive a mass market transition to CCS.
- An objective review of the perceived limitations of CCS and the type of adaptive regulatory framework required to secure CCS' commercial deployment.
Research and analysis highlights
- Despite record growth in renewables, global emission levels will rise as fossil fuel power generation continue to dominate. CCS is the only technology option currently available that could allow abundant, flexible and entrenched fossil fuels to continue to be used for electricity generation without adding to the damaging effects of climate change.
- The potential for CCS is undeniable and stakeholders are competing to take the technological lead. However, the costs and risks of CCS - made more apparent by the lack of regulatory framework - stand in the way of its widespread deployment. It is unlikely that CCS will make a credible contribution without strong legislative and regulatory change.
- The potential for CCS is highest in Poland, Czech Republic, Denmark and Greece, based on annual levels of coal-powered generation. The benefits of CCS outweigh the liabilities, however, to implement CCS safely and economically requires an adaptive regulatory framework encompassing safety, investment, operation and responsibility elements.
This report is available to Current London Business School students, faculty and staff from Datamonitor 360 which can be found on the A-Z list of library databases within Portal
Photo from Creative Commons: Flickr: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory